Micro-Moment Marketing: How to Get to Know Your Customer Without Invading Their Privacy

Nowadays, consumers want everything on-demand. But it’s up to marketers to balance convenience with privacy.

Today, we use our devices to satisfy our every need. Our friends text us asking us whether we want to try out a new restaurant (communication, on demand) and we look it up on our phones to read its menu (decision-making, on demand). Google Maps shows us that the restaurant isn’t far (directions, on demand), but being responsible people who aren’t going to have a couple draft beers with our meal and drive, we order an Uber to get there (transportation, on demand). At the restaurant, we don’t know the difference between Chimichurri and a Chimichanga, so we discreetly Google both under the table (saving face, on demand).

Google has named these intent-rich moments “micro-moments.” In 2015, they commissioned Forrester Research to measure the efficacy of marketers to deliver brand value on demand in these critical instances. The report, titled “Moments that Matter: Intent-Rich Moments Are Critical to Winning Today’s Consumer Journey,” paints the picture of a marketing industry in flux. Marketers are aware of the need for “instant gratification,” but according to Forrester, merely 2 percent of organizations have the necessary capabilities to identify, deliver on and measure micro-moments.

To provide instant gratification, you need to know your consumers better than they know themselves. Psychology, analytics, personas, customer journey mapping — leverage any tool you can, because these moments can happen at any time, and you also have to be able to predict when and what they will be looking for.

But there is another wrinkle here: the balance between privacy and convenience. How does the 21st-century marketer deliver experiences on demand without leaving the consumer feeling like an Orwellian big brother is watching?

Don’t Put a Target on Your Back

You may remember how Target used analytics to identify pregnant women based on their purchases. Target used a “pregnancy prediction score” to target coupon books of baby products to expectant mothers. A father apparently learned his teenaged daughter was pregnant when Target mailed her one of the baby product coupon booklets. Target received backlash from consumers. For marketers to properly insert themselves into micro-moments, an even deeper level of insight than this is required. Has the public become desensitized since then? Or has the delivered convenience of on-demand services reached the point that consumers are more than willing to look past privacy concerns?

The Demand for On-Demand

In 2014 alone, over $4 billion dollars of venture capital money poured into on-demand startups. It’s no surprise that VC firms chasing the elusive hockey stick curve are bullish on startups that deliver products and services for micro-moments.

But it hasn’t all been rosy. Despite $40 million in funding, on-demand home service startup Homejoy closed its metaphorical doors. Best described as “Uber for housecleaning,” Homejoy was doomed by labor disputes, but it’s larger than that. Homejoy isn’t an early indication that the on-demand market is overvalued, but instead shows its limitations. Consumers value the privacy of their homes and aren’t comfortable with letting just anybody in to clean. It will be important for marketers to understand these limits when learning how to deliver personalized micro-moments to a consumer.

Finding the Limits

Transparency is a valid way to find out what consumers are or aren’t comfortable with. A clear and open privacy policy can go a long way towards achieving this end. For example, take Tempo from CarePredict, a wearable sensor that tracks the movement of seniors living independently, giving their families peace of mind. It tracks everything from how long one is laying on the couch in the afternoon to the number of trips they take to the bathroom. Advanced monitoring and learning of both location and tempo determine whether someone is taking a nap or has fallen down in the living room. And the data is also accessible by health care providers to enable them to look for patterns that indicate undiagnosed illnesses.

While there’s certainly value in having peace of mind, it is not a stretch to define Tempo as an intrusive product that collects very personal data. CarePredict puts its users at ease by featuring their privacy policy prominently on their site. The comprehensive policy breaks down information collection and use, personally identifiable information, cookies, log files, security, referrals, corrections and notifications of changes. The more personalized the data you collect, the more you have to keep your consumer informed about exactly what you are doing with it.

Google, on the other hand, came under fire for allegedly implementing code that allows a chrome extension to eavesdrop on conversations held in front of the computer. Google denies that the mic listens to anything until it’s triggered by a hot-word detection of “OK Google,” but I’d be lying if I didn’t say I noticed more of the developers on my team covering the mics on their computers with tape.

The lines between personal and private are becoming increasingly blurred, and as marketers, we face an incredible challenge to navigate this successfully. The same rules that apply to advertising apply to data collection and personalization. Consumers are OK with brands reaching out in public spaces, but we don’t want brands in our beds whispering pillow talk to us.

Consumers Want the Illusion of Making the Choice, Not to Feel Like It’s Been Made for Them

Ultimately, the name of the game is reciprocity. In the case of Target’s much-maligned pregnancy prediction score, consumers didn’t ask for the intrusion. Target would argue that their pregnancy prediction metrics are about learning and satisfying the latent needs of their consumers, but the exchange is brand-initiated; Target is selling something to the consumer.

Today, more than ever, consumers want to, and do, control brands. Buying is consumer-initiated — an important distinction from the brand-initiated process of being sold to. If the data you are collecting informs a transaction that is consumer-initiated, they will be delighted that you are able to better tailor the brand interaction to precisely what they need in that moment.

In the right hands, sophisticated data lakes ultimately lead to consumer empowerment. True value from data collection lies not in the complexity and breadth of inputs that you are able to measure, but the strength of the output or insight that you are able to provide for the end user. Responsible micro-marketing that empowers the consumer will ensure 2017 isn’t like 1984.

Resources

Micro-Moment Marketing: How to Get to Know Your Customer Without Invading Their Privacy

Nowadays, consumers want everything on-demand. But it’s up to marketers to balance convenience with privacy.

Today, we use our devices to satisfy our every need. Our friends text us asking us whether we want to try out a new restaurant (communication, on demand) and we look it up on our phones to read its menu (decision-making, on demand). Google Maps shows us that the restaurant isn’t far (directions, on demand), but being responsible people who aren’t going to have a couple draft beers with our meal and drive, we order an Uber to get there (transportation, on demand). At the restaurant, we don’t know the difference between Chimichurri and a Chimichanga, so we discreetly Google both under the table (saving face, on demand).

Google has named these intent-rich moments “micro-moments.” In 2015, they commissioned Forrester Research to measure the efficacy of marketers to deliver brand value on demand in these critical instances. The report, titled “Moments that Matter: Intent-Rich Moments Are Critical to Winning Today’s Consumer Journey,” paints the picture of a marketing industry in flux. Marketers are aware of the need for “instant gratification,” but according to Forrester, merely 2 percent of organizations have the necessary capabilities to identify, deliver on and measure micro-moments.

To provide instant gratification, you need to know your consumers better than they know themselves. Psychology, analytics, personas, customer journey mapping — leverage any tool you can, because these moments can happen at any time, and you also have to be able to predict when and what they will be looking for.

But there is another wrinkle here: the balance between privacy and convenience. How does the 21st-century marketer deliver experiences on demand without leaving the consumer feeling like an Orwellian big brother is watching?

Don’t Put a Target on Your Back

You may remember how Target used analytics to identify pregnant women based on their purchases. Target used a “pregnancy prediction score” to target coupon books of baby products to expectant mothers. A father apparently learned his teenaged daughter was pregnant when Target mailed her one of the baby product coupon booklets. Target received backlash from consumers. For marketers to properly insert themselves into micro-moments, an even deeper level of insight than this is required. Has the public become desensitized since then? Or has the delivered convenience of on-demand services reached the point that consumers are more than willing to look past privacy concerns?

The Demand for On-Demand

In 2014 alone, over $4 billion dollars of venture capital money poured into on-demand startups. It’s no surprise that VC firms chasing the elusive hockey stick curve are bullish on startups that deliver products and services for micro-moments.

But it hasn’t all been rosy. Despite $40 million in funding, on-demand home service startup Homejoy closed its metaphorical doors. Best described as “Uber for housecleaning,” Homejoy was doomed by labor disputes, but it’s larger than that. Homejoy isn’t an early indication that the on-demand market is overvalued, but instead shows its limitations. Consumers value the privacy of their homes and aren’t comfortable with letting just anybody in to clean. It will be important for marketers to understand these limits when learning how to deliver personalized micro-moments to a consumer.

Finding the Limits

Transparency is a valid way to find out what consumers are or aren’t comfortable with. A clear and open privacy policy can go a long way towards achieving this end. For example, take Tempo from CarePredict, a wearable sensor that tracks the movement of seniors living independently, giving their families peace of mind. It tracks everything from how long one is laying on the couch in the afternoon to the number of trips they take to the bathroom. Advanced monitoring and learning of both location and tempo determine whether someone is taking a nap or has fallen down in the living room. And the data is also accessible by health care providers to enable them to look for patterns that indicate undiagnosed illnesses.

While there’s certainly value in having peace of mind, it is not a stretch to define Tempo as an intrusive product that collects very personal data. CarePredict puts its users at ease by featuring their privacy policy prominently on their site. The comprehensive policy breaks down information collection and use, personally identifiable information, cookies, log files, security, referrals, corrections and notifications of changes. The more personalized the data you collect, the more you have to keep your consumer informed about exactly what you are doing with it.

Google, on the other hand, came under fire for allegedly implementing code that allows a chrome extension to eavesdrop on conversations held in front of the computer. Google denies that the mic listens to anything until it’s triggered by a hot-word detection of “OK Google,” but I’d be lying if I didn’t say I noticed more of the developers on my team covering the mics on their computers with tape.

The lines between personal and private are becoming increasingly blurred, and as marketers, we face an incredible challenge to navigate this successfully. The same rules that apply to advertising apply to data collection and personalization. Consumers are OK with brands reaching out in public spaces, but we don’t want brands in our beds whispering pillow talk to us.

Consumers Want the Illusion of Making the Choice, Not to Feel Like It’s Been Made for Them

Ultimately, the name of the game is reciprocity. In the case of Target’s much-maligned pregnancy prediction score, consumers didn’t ask for the intrusion. Target would argue that their pregnancy prediction metrics are about learning and satisfying the latent needs of their consumers, but the exchange is brand-initiated; Target is selling something to the consumer.

Today, more than ever, consumers want to, and do, control brands. Buying is consumer-initiated — an important distinction from the brand-initiated process of being sold to. If the data you are collecting informs a transaction that is consumer-initiated, they will be delighted that you are able to better tailor the brand interaction to precisely what they need in that moment.

In the right hands, sophisticated data lakes ultimately lead to consumer empowerment. True value from data collection lies not in the complexity and breadth of inputs that you are able to measure, but the strength of the output or insight that you are able to provide for the end user. Responsible micro-marketing that empowers the consumer will ensure 2017 isn’t like 1984.

See Also: Your Guide to Creating a Unified Remote Work Culture

If you have insights like this to share,

and join us!